{ "absence_claim_enabled": false, "algorithm_ids": [ "evidence_join", "time_window_coverage_scoring", "source_freshness_scoring", "csv_to_public_counterparty_matching", "subsidy_regulation_eligibility_triage_without_verdict", "deadline_risk_ranking", "no_hit_semantics" ], "blueprints": [ { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "supported_claim_ref", "candidate_claim_ref", "known_gap" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": false }, "algorithm_id": "evidence_join", "deterministic_steps": [ "Sort receipts by source_family_id, canonical_subject_id, observed_at, and receipt_id.", "Join by explicit receipt_id and fragment_id first; fall back only to exact canonical subject and section keys.", "Emit supported claim refs only when every required claim field has a receipt-backed fragment.", "Emit candidate or gap states for partial joins; never synthesize missing claim text." ], "display_name": "Evidence Join", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "unjoined_claim_candidates_emit_known_gap", "ambiguous_subject_join_emits_gap_instead_of_best_guess", "blocked_source_receipts_emit_blocked_item" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "First-party source receipts with receipt_id, source_family_id, observed_at, and support_state.", "name": "source_receipts", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Extracted text or metadata fragments already tied to source_receipt IDs and stable section keys.", "name": "evidence_fragments", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Structured candidate claims generated from deterministic packet templates, not free-form inference.", "name": "claim_candidates", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "derived_public_fact" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": false, "formula": "not_applicable", "method_id": "exact_key_join_no_score", "rounding": "not_applicable", "score_range": null, "tie_breakers": [] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Claim references that carry the exact receipt IDs and fragment IDs used as proof.", "name": "joined_claim_refs", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Candidates that could not be joined to proof and therefore cannot become public claims.", "name": "rejected_claim_candidates", "proof_required": false, "visibility": "internal" }, { "description": "Known gaps for missing receipts, missing sections, ambiguous subjects, or blocked sources.", "name": "coverage_gaps", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "public_claims_must_reference_source_receipt_ids", "joined_claim_refs_must_include_fragment_ids", "candidate_claims_without_required_receipts_are_not_public_claims" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Join artifact claim candidates to first-party evidence fragments using explicit receipt and subject keys before any public claim can be emitted." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "coverage_score", "covered_segment", "known_gap" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": false }, "algorithm_id": "time_window_coverage_scoring", "deterministic_steps": [ "Normalize dates to local calendar days and half-open intervals [start, end).", "Union overlapping observed windows per source family after sorting by start date, end date, and receipt_id.", "Intersect observed windows with required windows and sum covered weighted days.", "Emit missing or stale intervals as known gaps; no uncovered interval becomes an absence claim." ], "display_name": "Time-Window Coverage Scoring", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "uncovered_required_windows_emit_known_gap", "stale_observed_windows_emit_stale_gap", "coverage_below_threshold_blocks_final_artifact_or_marks_gap" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "Requested half-open date windows with source_family_id and required coverage weight.", "name": "required_windows", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" }, { "description": "Receipt-backed half-open date windows with valid_from, valid_to, and receipt IDs.", "name": "observed_windows", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Deterministic evaluation date supplied by the caller or release capsule.", "name": "as_of_date", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "clock_parameter" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": true, "formula": "score = sum(covered_days_i * weight_i) / sum(required_days_i * weight_i)", "method_id": "weighted_interval_coverage_ratio_v1", "rounding": "round_half_up_to_4_decimal_places_after_clamp_0_1", "score_range": [ 0.0, 1.0 ], "tie_breakers": [ "earlier_required_window_start", "source_family_id", "receipt_id" ] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Weighted coverage ratio from 0.0 to 1.0 with formula ID and input window IDs.", "name": "coverage_score", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Receipt-backed covered date segments after deterministic interval union.", "name": "covered_segments", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Known gaps for uncovered, stale, or blocked date segments.", "name": "missing_or_stale_segments", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "each_covered_segment_must_reference_receipt_ids", "coverage_score_must_include_window_ids_and_formula_id", "score_inputs_are_date_ranges_not_free_text" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Score how much of a requested period is covered by first-party evidence without treating uncovered time as proof that no event occurred." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "freshness_score", "fresh_receipt", "stale_gap" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": false }, "algorithm_id": "source_freshness_scoring", "deterministic_steps": [ "Compute non-negative age_days from as_of_date minus observed_at date.", "Look up source_family freshness_sla_days; unknown SLA emits a freshness gap.", "Score each receipt by linear decay and weighted mean by source family.", "Sort stale receipts by oldest observed_at, source_family_id, and receipt_id." ], "display_name": "Source Freshness Scoring", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "unknown_sla_emits_known_gap", "missing_observed_at_emits_known_gap", "stale_receipt_blocks_fresh_claim_wording" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "First-party receipts with observed_at timestamps and source family IDs.", "name": "source_receipts", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Configured maximum age per source family before a receipt is stale.", "name": "freshness_sla_days", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" }, { "description": "Deterministic evaluation timestamp supplied by the caller or release capsule.", "name": "as_of_date", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "clock_parameter" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": true, "formula": "receipt_score = max(0, 1 - age_days / freshness_sla_days); score = weighted_mean(receipt_score)", "method_id": "linear_age_decay_weighted_mean_v1", "rounding": "round_half_up_to_4_decimal_places_after_clamp_0_1", "score_range": [ 0.0, 1.0 ], "tie_breakers": [ "older_observed_at_first", "source_family_id", "receipt_id" ] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Weighted score from 0.0 to 1.0 with age days, SLA days, and receipt IDs.", "name": "freshness_score", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Receipts inside the configured freshness window.", "name": "fresh_receipts", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Receipts outside the configured freshness window, emitted as gaps before final use.", "name": "stale_receipts", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "freshness_scores_must_reference_receipt_ids", "stale_receipt_findings_must_keep_original_observed_at", "unknown_observed_at_is_gap_not_estimate" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Score receipt freshness against configured source-family service windows using only supplied observed_at metadata." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "candidate_match", "unmatched_private_fact", "public_record_check" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": true }, "algorithm_id": "csv_to_public_counterparty_matching", "deterministic_steps": [ "Normalize supplied public names and identifiers with configured exact rules before scoring.", "Score exact registration-number matches above corporate-number matches, name matches, and alias matches.", "Emit candidate matches only when public record receipts exist and private raw values remain absent.", "Keep unmatched CSV-derived facts tenant-private and hash-only; never export raw rows." ], "display_name": "CSV-To-Public Counterparty Matching", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "missing_public_receipt_emits_gap_not_match", "below_threshold_match_emits_unmatched_private_fact", "conflicting_public_records_emit_ambiguous_counterparty_gap" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "Minimized tenant-private facts such as hashed counterparty keys, amount buckets, and provider family.", "name": "private_counterparty_fingerprints", "privacy_handling": "tenant_private_minimized", "required": true, "source_scope": "tenant_private_csv_fact" }, { "description": "Receipt-backed public records such as invoice registry or company profile rows already supplied.", "name": "public_counterparty_records", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Deterministic alias keys from first-party or tenant-approved configuration.", "name": "allowed_alias_table", "privacy_handling": "tenant_private_minimized", "required": false, "source_scope": "configuration" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": true, "formula": "score = max(exact_invoice_number*1.0, exact_corporate_number*0.95, exact_normalized_name*0.85, configured_alias*0.75)", "method_id": "deterministic_counterparty_match_score_v1", "rounding": "round_half_up_to_4_decimal_places_after_clamp_0_1", "score_range": [ 0.0, 1.0 ], "tie_breakers": [ "higher_score", "public_receipt_observed_at_desc", "source_family_id", "receipt_id" ] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Candidate public-record matches with score, reason code, receipt IDs, and private value fingerprints only.", "name": "counterparty_match_candidates", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "tenant_private" }, { "description": "Private fact fingerprints that did not reach candidate threshold.", "name": "unmatched_private_facts", "proof_required": false, "visibility": "tenant_private" }, { "description": "Public source checks that can be cited independently of private CSV content.", "name": "public_record_checks", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "public_record_checks_must_reference_public_receipt_ids", "private_csv_facts_may_rank_or_filter_but_never_support_public_claim_text", "match_candidates_must_include_private_fingerprint_not_raw_value" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Match minimized tenant-private accounting CSV-derived counterparty facts to supplied public records as candidate checks, while preventing private facts from becoming public proof." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "candidate_for_review", "triage_signal", "question_for_professional" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": true }, "algorithm_id": "subsidy_regulation_eligibility_triage_without_verdict", "deterministic_steps": [ "Map applicant facts to requirement keys only when both sides have explicit normalized keys.", "Classify each requirement signal as matched, missing, unknown, conflict, or professional_review_required.", "Unknown and conflict signals reduce triage confidence but never become negative verdicts.", "Emit candidate_for_review and questions_for_professional instead of eligibility or compliance conclusions." ], "display_name": "Subsidy/Regulation Eligibility Triage Without Verdict", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "unknown_requirement_signal_emits_known_gap", "missing_applicant_fact_emits_question_not_negative_verdict", "conflicting_source_requirements_emit_professional_review_gap" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "Minimized applicant facts supplied by the user or derived from tenant-private CSV buckets.", "name": "applicant_profile_facts", "privacy_handling": "tenant_private_minimized", "required": false, "source_scope": "tenant_private_csv_fact" }, { "description": "Receipt-backed requirement, exclusion, deadline, and document rules from first-party evidence.", "name": "program_or_regulation_requirements", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Configured signal weights and mandatory review gates for candidate ranking.", "name": "triage_policy", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": true, "formula": "score = sum(matched_signal_weight) / sum(known_required_signal_weight); unknown and conflict signals are reported separately", "method_id": "known_signal_triage_ratio_v1", "rounding": "round_half_up_to_4_decimal_places_after_clamp_0_1", "score_range": [ 0.0, 1.0 ], "tie_breakers": [ "higher_score", "earlier_deadline", "fresher_requirement_receipt", "program_id" ] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Requirement signals marked matched, missing, unknown, conflict, or professional_review_required.", "name": "triage_signals", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "tenant_private" }, { "description": "Ranked candidate item for human review; explicitly not an eligibility or compliance verdict.", "name": "candidate_for_review", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "tenant_private" }, { "description": "Deterministic questions generated from missing, unknown, or conflicting source-backed signals.", "name": "questions_for_professional", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "tenant_private" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "every_requirement_signal_must_reference_requirement_receipt_ids", "private_applicant_facts_must_remain_minimized_and_tenant_private", "candidate_for_review_must_include_do_not_claim_verdict_boundary" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Rank source-backed requirement signals for professional review without asserting subsidy eligibility, regulatory compliance, or accounting treatment." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "deadline_risk_rank", "review_priority", "known_gap" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": true }, "algorithm_id": "deadline_risk_ranking", "deterministic_steps": [ "Compute days_until_due from as_of_date and due_at using local calendar days.", "Compute buffer_ratio from preparation_days_by_action divided by max(days_until_due, 1).", "Add freshness penalty from source freshness state and missing-date penalty from gap state.", "Sort by descending risk score, then earliest due_at, then source_family_id and receipt_id." ], "display_name": "Deadline Risk Ranking", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "missing_due_at_emits_known_gap", "overdue_deadline_emits_overdue_gap_not_outcome_statement", "stale_deadline_source_emits_refresh_required_gap" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "Receipt-backed deadlines with due_at, source_family_id, and required action labels.", "name": "deadline_records", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Configured minimum preparation days per action type.", "name": "preparation_days_by_action", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" }, { "description": "Deterministic evaluation date supplied by the caller or release capsule.", "name": "as_of_date", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "clock_parameter" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": true, "formula": "risk_score = clamp(0, 100, urgency_points + buffer_pressure_points + freshness_penalty_points + missing_data_penalty_points)", "method_id": "deadline_urgency_buffer_freshness_score_v1", "rounding": "round_half_up_to_2_decimal_places_after_clamp_0_100", "score_range": [ 0.0, 100.0 ], "tie_breakers": [ "higher_risk_score", "earlier_due_at", "source_family_id", "receipt_id" ] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Deadline records sorted by risk score with formula ID, receipt IDs, and tie-break trace.", "name": "ranked_deadline_risks", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Known gaps or warnings when a due date is missing, stale, overdue, or inside prep buffer.", "name": "overdue_or_imminent_gaps", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Non-advisory internal scheduling suggestions keyed to source-backed due dates.", "name": "calendar_hold_suggestions", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "internal" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "ranked_deadlines_must_reference_deadline_receipt_ids", "calendar_suggestions_must_reference_same_due_at_source", "missing_due_at_cannot_be_ranked_as_if_known" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Rank receipt-backed deadlines by deterministic urgency, preparation buffer, and source freshness so artifacts can prioritize review work without promising outcomes." }, { "advice_boundary": { "allowed_conclusion_states": [ "no_hit_observed", "unchecked_scope_gap", "refresh_required" ], "asserts_legal_or_accounting_advice": false, "forbidden_assertions": [ "legal_advice", "accounting_advice", "tax_advice", "application_eligibility_verdict", "regulatory_compliance_verdict", "grant_award_prediction", "audit_opinion" ], "professional_review_required": false }, "algorithm_id": "no_hit_semantics", "deterministic_steps": [ "Compare checked_scope to required_scope by exact source family, filter, and time-window keys.", "Emit a no_hit_lease only for the checked scope and configured expiry window.", "Emit unchecked_scope_gaps for any required scope outside the observed no-hit query.", "Disable absence claims in every public and internal no-hit output." ], "display_name": "No-Hit Semantics", "gap_handling": { "absence_claim_enabled": false, "gap_outputs": [ "known_gaps", "blocked_items", "no_hit_lease" ], "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "rules": [ "no_hit_not_absence", "unchecked_scope_emits_known_gap", "expired_no_hit_lease_emits_refresh_required_gap" ] }, "inputs": [ { "description": "Exact query scope, source families, filters, and observed_at timestamp that produced no hit.", "name": "checked_scope", "privacy_handling": "public", "required": true, "source_scope": "first_party_evidence" }, { "description": "Configured source families and filters expected for the requested artifact.", "name": "required_scope", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" }, { "description": "Configured expiry duration for reusing a no-hit observation.", "name": "lease_policy", "privacy_handling": "none", "required": true, "source_scope": "configuration" } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "numerical_method": { "applies": false, "formula": "not_applicable", "method_id": "scope_contract_no_score", "rounding": "not_applicable", "score_range": null, "tie_breakers": [] }, "outputs": [ { "description": "Scoped lease stating what was checked, when it expires, and that absence claims are disabled.", "name": "no_hit_lease", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Known gaps for source families, filters, or periods outside the checked scope.", "name": "unchecked_scope_gaps", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "public" }, { "description": "Deterministic follow-up source families or filters needed before artifact completion.", "name": "next_checks", "proof_required": true, "visibility": "internal" } ], "proof_handling": { "private_csv_can_support_public_claims": false, "required_reference_fields": [ "receipt_ids", "claim_ref_ids", "gap_ids" ], "rules": [ "no_hit_lease_must_reference_checked_scope_and_observed_at", "no_hit_wording_must_say_observed_search_result_only", "unchecked_scope_gaps_must_list_missing_source_families_or_filters" ], "support_states": [ "supported", "candidate", "gap", "blocked" ] }, "purpose": "Represent no-hit observations as scoped search results with leases and gaps, never as proof that a record, program, obligation, or event does not exist." } ], "llm_allowed": false, "network_allowed": false, "no_hit_semantics": "no_hit_not_absence", "schema_version": "jpcite.algorithm_blueprints.p0.v1" }